The Dangers of Negationism

“The worst illiterate is the political illiterate. He hears nothing, sees nothing, takes no part in political life. He doesn't seem to know that the cost of living, the price of beans, of flour, of rent, of medicines, all depend on political decisions. He even prides himself on his political ignorance, sticks out his chest and says he hates politics. He doesn't know, the imbecile, that from his political non-participation comes the prostitute, the abandoned child, the robber, and, worst of all, corrupt officials, the lackeys of exploitative multinational corporations.”

Bertolt Brecht. 1898 – 1956, German poet, playwright, and theatre director

The survivors of most communal riots face an existential dilemma once situation gets ‘normalised’. Except for a handful who choose to migrate elsewhere, most are forced to continue on with their lives in their old localities, surrounded by the very people who had turned on them ferociously only a few days earlier. It is not always easy for the aggressor either to look into the eye of the survivor; particularly for those who otherwise had enjoyed congenial or even indifferent relations with the survivor. Not surprisingly, the ingenious human mind finds a way out and invariably, the rioters are declared to be ‘outsiders’, people from other localities or even villages, faceless and anti-socials beings! This transfer of culpability is not done by the aggressor out of guilt alone. The survivor too is complicit in this act, knowing fully well that he has no option but to share space with the aggressor even going forward and more importantly, to sate his need to believe that his friendly face of the yore couldn’t have turned beastly one day. Stories of such negationism (denial followed by fantasy) have been witnessed across riot torn people ever since the nature of riots became a subject of study. A few years after the partition, the very Punjabi who otherwise boasted of the number of men he killed or of the women he violated, started blaming the faceless 'other' for all ills of those riots.

While this negationism does manage to bandage the wound sufficient enough for life to progress, is this fair to those who suffered in riots? And how effective is denial in ‘reforming’ those who engage in riots?

Why does any society, howsoever primitive, possess a code of law which seeks to punish those who digress social mores? Simply speaking - to restore the societal balance, to provide justice to the harmed and most importantly, to punish the culprit for the crime so that the fear of punishment acts as a deterrent were he to stray from the societal path again.

But imagine a situation where the culprit is sought to be hidden and blame assigned to faceless people? Is the society then doing enough to redress the harm caused to the victim? Even more importantly, is it performing its moral obligation to hold a mirror to the culprit and show him his face made ugly by the crime? Punishment obviously cannot be imposed when the culprit is not even identified. So, is the culprit deterred by this denial? No. Is he emboldened further? Ys, as he knows no fear of punishment, secure in knowledge that he will neither be identified, nor shamed nor punished!

While the need for those involved in riots to engage in this exercise of denial can still be understood, what is inexplicable as to why do Governments and media-person engage in negationism? One generous reason could be their genuine belief in efficacy of denial. The second and more tragic reason is their pandering to their respective ideologies and biases. Hence, homilies abound whenever reporting of riots have to happen. If possible, riots don’t get reported if a particular community is the culprit and if too large to be ignored, blame is assigned to the victims. Readers shaking their heads in disbelief at this assertion would do good to take a single case - Bareilly, which has witnessed 3 riots in the last 2 years. The riots of March 2010, when the mob celebrating birthday of the Prophet attacked Hindu homes was sought to be blamed on Bajrang Dal. The July 2012 riots when mobs attacked Kaanwarias was sought to be blamed on music being played by them and riots again now, where scapegoats are still being found. A person reading news-reports of these riots will be stuck by the absence of any reproach for the Muslim mobs. If, even for arguments sake, it is agreed that music is abhorrent to Muslims, does it give them the right to murder and commit mayhem?

What will help in restoring order? A Government which identifies the culprits and punishes them or a one which only seeks to blame the victim?

An indulgent mother, who chooses to blame other kids for the shenanigans of her bully child only paves the way for her child becoming a hardened criminal. If only she had overcome her immediate maternal instincts and chosen to punish the child for his wrongdoings, her child still could have had a chance at being reformed. Sadly for the Nation, this attitude of successive governments and powerful media houses will only spell doom for its tottering fraternity. For too long has the Government and media indulged in this dangerous game of negationism. Will it have courage to recognise that their short term selfish interests are creating a Frankenstein which will devour them, in not so distant a future?

Let them have some courage, courage to see and report truth as it is. Let them develop a conviction strong enough to recognise that even the genuinely aggrieved, irrespective of their community, don’t have the right to riot and kill innocents. Let them be brave enough to recognise that there people who have grown on a narrative of victimhood can be the oppressors too.