The year was 1921 and large swathes of India were in throes of an agitation. An agitation to force British to cede power to Indians and also to force them to reinstate the Caliphate in Turkey. Interestingly, this Khilafat movement did not originate in Turkey, the seat of the erstwhile Ottoman empire. It did not originate in Iraq, the seat of among the most glorious of Caliphates. It did not originate in Saudi Arabia, the land of the two holy mosques either, nor did it originate in Iran, the seat of among the mightiest empires the world has seen. Not only did none of these Islamic Nations rise in protest against abolition of the seat of the Caliph, the spiritual and temporal head of Muslims worldwide; none of these Nations' protests came even close to the intensity displyed by Khilafat in India.
For most people, the act of deposing a never seen, never heard, never knew existed, nominal King in very very distant lands would not even register into consciousness. Inexplicably though, the issue was potent enough to harness the collective rage of large masses of Indian Muslims against the British. For the first time after the 1857 War of Independence did the Muslims see the British as enemies and they, as a body, for the first time joined a quasi struggle for freedom against the British.
A movement for India, which was built around a cause irrelevant to India was bound to unravel and fail. Within a few months, the Khilafat movement morphed into the bloody Mopallah riots of Malabar, where the Muslim Mopallah, having been beaten by the British, turned its wrath to the hapless Hindu community. No distinction was made in between the peasant, the outcaste the jenmi (Landlord) and the Namboodiri (Brahmin), nor was any thought spared for the women and the old. Dr Annie Besant reported that Muslim Mappila (Mopallah) forcibly converted many Hindus and killed or drove away all Hindus who would not apostatise, a number totaling to one lakh!
The Mopallah rebellion was the first among the many pogroms which preceded the state of Pakistan and showed what the Hindu could expect in a state governed by Islamic Law. While discussion on the massacres preceding and succeeding creation of Pakistan can take Gigabytes and Gigabytes, what is noteworthy that the ‘path’ shown by the Mopallah has been faithfully followed by the agitating Muslim even 90 years into that gory chapter of Indian history.
For those among us who mutter in muted tones on why should Muslims riot in Mumbai for supposed atrocities committed on their co-religionists in Myanmar (a foreign country), and Assam, they probably forget that such rioting has historical and recent precedent. Be it US attack on Iraq or a demonstration in support of Osama Bin Laden, the presence of Taslima Nasreen or attack on Afghanistan, the aggrieved Indian Muslim has rioted, killed and damaged public and private property. A little earlier, it rioted when Satanic Verses was banned, when the British invaded Suez and when the hair of the Prophet at Hazratbal was stolen. Note that in none of these riots could the average Hindu or even his co-religionist anywhere, could be accused of ‘hurting’ the Muslim but the former was the inevitable target of these riots. Seems that we will live to see a thousand more Mopallah rebellions on our lands.
Refer to Riots after Riots for a more detailed note.
PS:
Sadly, while our media discourse stretches credulity when it would make us believe that only an aggrieved minority has the right to protest, it goes far beyond the borders of negationism, when it manages to justify violence committed in course of unrelated protests. One gentleman from Times of India, today reports that 50 people, ‘dressed’ as Muslims protested at Lucknow today. This, when even TwoCircles.net reports that Muslims rioted in Lucknow and Allahabad and as per Rediff, this protesting mob was around 25,000 strong.
No comments:
Post a Comment